![]() |
Antenna Design Software
Design & Performance of Compact, Centre-Loaded Dipole AntennasAuthor: R.J.Edwards G4FGQ © 1st July 2000When the overall length of an HF dipole is less than about 1/3rd wavelength radiating efficiency decreases rapidly. Additional loss occurs not in the antenna itself but in the feedline due to high SWR, and also in the tuner. Locating tuning and matching functions at the dipole centre reduces line loss. Tuning loss is minimised by using a very large, high Q loading coil. Although centre loading significantly improves overall efficiency most loss now occurs in the coil itself unless the antenna is very near the ground when ground loss eventually predominates. Ground loss decreases rapidly with height till height exceeds dipole length. It will be seen the program compensates for ground proximity detuning by reducing the number of turns on the loading coil. The fraction of length occupied by the coil varies widely. A 1/3-wave antenna is mostly wire with a short coil at its centre. A 1/40th-wave, 160m antenna might consist of a 2-metre long slender coil with a 1 metre rod or wire at each end. "Slinky's" have no rod or wire extensions and can be suspended on a taut line. But these are toys. A larger coil volume reduces loss for the same overall antenna length but an increase in coil length is preferable to an increase in diameter because a slightly better current distribution results. There are Three Ways of Coupling a Feedline to a Centre-Loaded Antenna
The antenna is a large tuned circuit. The capacitances looking into the inner ends of the rods or wires are in parallel with the coil. Wire, ground and radiation losses have three equivalent lumped resistance values located in the middle of the coil. Precise tuning can be done by pruning rod or wire lengths. In confined spaces such as attics the proximity to structural materials will have effects similar to being near to the ground - inefficiency and detuning. Tight coupling between coil and link windings can be achieved by winding the link over or in between the coil turns. But very tight coupling is not always necessary. Use plastic-insulated wire for the link. Wire diameter need be no greater than used in the feedline itself. Since much loss occurs in the loading coil a physically large coil allows a larger wire diameter, increases Q, improves heat dissipating capability and improves radiating efficiency. Prefer (wire diameter)/(winding pitch) ratios between 0.5 to 0.75 which will reduce weight relative to close-wound coils and may moderately enhance Q. The centre-loaded dipole is a single band antenna most useful when there is insufficient space to erect a full size 1/2-wave dipole so most likely it will be used on the 40m and lower frequency bands. Power efficiency can approach that of a magloop if a sufficiently heavy gauge of wire is used and the antenna is erected well above ground and not near to buildings. Design philosophy: For a given overall length make the coil physically large, giving some preference to coil length. But don't make it too slender. Program Operating Notes The program automatically restricts the ratio of coil wire diameter/pitch to 0.95 to allow for insulation. For a close-wound coil just enter ratio = 1 but close-wound enamel-insulated wire is recommended only for its convenience. Warning messages may appear on the screen when impractical or conflicting values of input data have been entered. Some computed values may be in error when one of these messages is being displayed. As overall antenna length approaches 1/2-wave the number of turns on the coil becomes small and computed values of wire size and of coil tap turns may be impractical. Other computed values may also be suspicious. However, a dipole near to a 1/2-wave in length does not need a loading coil. Carefully observe measurement units when entering and reading data Run this Program from the Web or Download and Run
it from Your Computer Discuss, debate and ask questions about compact, center-loaded dipole antennas in the Ham Radio Technical Forum. This page was last modified: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:57:08 GMT
|