![]() |
Antenna Design Software
Short, Coil-Loaded, Ground-Mounted, Vertical or Slanting AntennasAuthor: R.J.Edwards G4FGQ © 28th November 2000The feedpoint impedance of a short vertical antenna has a high capacitive reactance. To present a purely resistive load to the transmitter somewhere in the system there must be an inductive reactance to cancel it. All coils have a loss resistance and the question arises - where in the system can a large coil be conveniently located such that power-radiating efficiency is maximised? Loss resistance decreases as the coil's physical size increases. There may not be sufficient room available to accommodate a large coil indoors or inside a vehicle. Locating a coil in the antenna itself poses construction problems but for a given size of coil there is always a height of coil at which efficiency is maximised. At a given frequency, other factors influencing coil height are overall antenna height and the loss resistance of the ground electrode system. As antenna height increases, optimum coil height decreases. As antenna height approaches about 1/5th wavelength the difference in efficiency between a high and a low coil is so small the coil can be located in the most mechanically convenient place - at the bottom of the antenna. This program assists with coil design and computes the most efficient height of coil above feedpoint. Factors Affecting radiating Efficiency
Operating Notes The ends of the coil cannot protrude beyond the top and bottom of the antenna. Height is entered as a percentage of the distance between the upper and lower possible extreme positions of the coil's midpoint. Actual height is computed. To avoid computational problems associated with impossible coil turns and wire diameter the program will not accept overall antenna heights greater than 0.24 wavelengths. Also program modeling accuracy is poor for the effects of a self-resonant coil at the top of a nearly resonant antenna. Coil lengths greater than 1/3 of overall height are allowed but the accuracy of computing radiating efficiency and coil turns is impaired. The program is not recommended for accurate modeling of helical antennas. When the difference in efficiency between a coil at moderate height and a base loading coil is less than 1 dB the inconvenience, cost or fragility of a high coil may not be considered justified and the antenna can be loaded with a coil incorporated in a tuning unit located immediately at the antenna's feedpoint. Computed coil wire diameter is for a wire diameter/winding-pitch ratio of 0.66. This is not a critical value and may be between 0.6 and 0.72 or to the nearest wire gauge. Close wound coils of enameled (magnet) wire are not recommended. When an antenna is mounted on a road vehicle the vehicle itself forms part of the radiating system which is coupled to ground via capacitance. Ground losses may be small but the additional feedpoint reactance may need tuning out with a few more turns on the coil than the computed number. Or simply adjust length of the antenna top section for resonance in the required frequency band. Ground Loss Resistance - Crude Guesstimates Loss resistance of vehicle roof-mounted antennas varies between 2 and 12 ohms, being greater for small vehicles. But surface soil resistivity has an effect. A shallow-buried circular close-mesh mat has a loss resistance not less than 0.5*(Soil Resistivity)/(Mat Diameter in metres) ohms. The table below is for a soil resistivity of 100 ohm-metres = 10 mS. N = Number of shallow-buried 12- gauge radials. Length is in metres. Ohms = resistance-to-ground at the focus.
Run this Program from the Web or Download and Run
it from Your Computer Discuss, debate and ask questions about short, coil-loaded, ground-mounted, vertical or slanting antennas in the Ham Radio Technical Forum. This page was last modified: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:33:29 GMT
|